Comparison of methods: Analysis of method included implications of different labour force surveys

  • Project number: F 2240
  • Institution: Internationales Institut für Empirische Sozialökonomie gGmH
  • Status: Completed Project


This project aims to compare the strengths and weaknesses of different labour force surveys (especially: BiBB-BAuA-Erwerbstätigenbefragung, Was ist gute Arbeit; European Working Condition Survey) which result from the methodic data collection. Focal points of the comparison will be working conditions, resulting strains and health disorders. Additionally, it shall be tested whether the calculation of indices and job-exposure-matrices is reasonable and feasible.

The results shall give an impression of the limits of interpretation different studies have got. Furthermore, the results shall be used for the improvement of the forthcoming BiBB-BAuA-Erwerbstätigenbefragung.


CAPI versus CATI: Ein Vergleich der BIBB/IAB-Erhebung 1998 mit der BIBB/BAuA-Erwerbstätigenbefragung 2005

Publishing year: 2012

Suchergebnis_Format Report

find out more


Unit 1.2 "Monitoring Working Conditions"

Phone: +49 231 9071-1971
Fax: +49 231 9071-2070